Please focus all discussion of the To-Do list's future contents into this thread.
Propose new tasks to add to the list along with your rationale behind proposing them.
Offline
For instance, there was this IRC snippet (edited for clarity):
[00:52] <LunarSD> EN is celebrity-endorsed: http://www.cantstoptheserenity.com/
[00:52] <LunarSD> and fairly wealthy
[00:52] <LunarSD> HOWEVER --> We have the potential to be celebrity-endorsed as well --> http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2008/12/w … peech.html
[00:53] <LunarSD> I still fantasize about getting Joss Whedon and Neil Gaiman bumping horns over this
[00:53] <LunarSD> since they iconically represent both sides
[00:53] <KarenKozuki> You know, if we got Joss Whedon, that would make my entire life complete
[00:54] <LunarSD> did you click that link?
[00:54] <KarenKozuki> I've read that (Neil Gaiman's defense of "Icky Speech") many times
[00:54] <KarenKozuki> and link it to people constantly
[00:54] <LunarSD> the first link, I mean
[00:54] <LunarSD> the Serenity one
[00:54] <KarenKozuki> oh geeze
[00:54] <KarenKozuki> what the hell man
[00:54] <LunarSD> that's exactly how I felt
[00:54] <LunarSD> he (Joss Whedon) has a brilliant mind
[00:54] <LunarSD> but WTF
[00:55] <LunarSD> he's EN's poster boy
[00:55] <LunarSD> I'd like to think he simply hasn't realized yet the sobering,
[00:55] <LunarSD> misguided cruelty behind EN's current book-burning antics
[00:55] <KarenKozuki> I suddenly feel a huge pit in my stomach
[00:55] <KarenKozuki> I am very mad at them for their extreme actions
[00:55] <KarenKozuki> and for getting people to act misogynistic and angry towards my gender in general,
[00:55] <KarenKozuki> for no reason other than it was EN's fault this censorship mess started.
[00:55] <KarenKozuki> I can't go rip their heads off. We would be sinking to their extreme levels.
[00:55] <@sycamore> lol
[00:55] <Dakeyrus> Oh Whedon..
[00:55] <Dakeyrus> The man who gave us Firefly ![]()
[00:55] <Dakeyrus> I think his mind is still somewhere out in space ![]()
[00:55] <LunarSD> he's the reason they get MILLIONS annually in donation
[00:55] <LunarSD> and such a huge membership
[00:56] <LunarSD> Writing a letter to Joss Whedon, to alert him what's happening under his nose (likely without his realization)...
[00:56] <LunarSD> could be our Trojan Horse
[00:56] <LunarSD> ... Especially if that letter came from Neil Gaiman ...
[00:56] <KarenKozuki> I love all his work but now I don't feel like supporting him. Agrh.
[00:56] <Dakeyrus> KarenKozuki: He's made some amazing stuff, there's nothing wrong with continuing to support his work
[00:56] <Dakeyrus> You intend to try to get Gaiman's support, then?
[00:57] <LunarSD> probably now isn't the time though
[00:57] <LunarSD> we've got to hurry and fill up our web site (not just the forums) with good information
[00:57] <LunarSD> and look more presentable
Offline
Ugh... why Joss Whedon out of all people? Every pixel on that site was excruciatingly painful. While I hope we can eventually somehow persuade him to abandon this... organization, I'm not holding my breath. Sorry for not saying anything useful, I had to get it off my mind.

Offline
It's ironic that Whedon's Firefly series was all about rugged individualists carving out an existance against overarching government control, and here we have his beloved EN clamoring to the UN for more of that very control.
Last edited by restless (2009-07-25 13:17:02)
Offline
Keep in mind guys that EN have actually done alot of good for women that hasn't stepped on the toes of other peoples rights. It's just one of their latest actions is counter productive, and does infringe on quite alot of peoples rights.
I also believe that we should add a short argument to the lolicon document in relation to the latest swiss research (the one saying that the motivation to view porn is different to that of hurting a child). This being that the few people who do view it due to their urges for real life children still do not and may never have the urge to violate a child in real life. Due to the different motivations for viewing pornography and enacting it in real life. Thus showing that the viewing of such material is harmless to the person viewing.
Also UNICEF argue that lolicon can be used to groom chidren in real life. What they neglect to mention is that real life over 18 pornography can also be used and has the exact same effect. This should also be included in the document.
I will start writting now if no one else is interested.
Offline
Keep in mind guys that EN have actually done alot of good for women that hasn't stepped on the toes of other peoples rights. It's just one of their latest actions is counter productive, and does infringe on quite alot of peoples rights.
I'm well aware of EN's history, but they still don't deserve any sort of free pass for their current actions. Especially since EN's stance is that Japan's history of low rape rates is irrelevant to the current situation. If EN is going to selectively ignore historical evidence, then turnabout is fair play, if only to point out their hypocrisy.
This is getting a bit ranty, and I'm probably not being very constructive. I'll just stop here.
Offline
restless wrote:
I'm well aware of EN's history, but they still don't deserve any sort of free pass for their current actions. Especially since EN's stance is that Japan's history of low rape rates is irrelevant to the current situation. If EN is going to selectively ignore historical evidence, then turnabout is fair play, if only to point out their hypocrisy.
This is getting a bit ranty, and I'm probably not being very constructive. I'll just stop here.
Nay, we are hardly giving them 'any sort of free pass'. The quoted text is directly related to Whetdon's association with Equality Now. It also serves as a reminder that even if we are opposing crusaders deathly convinced of their righteousness, we should not and must not demonize or dehumanize our opposition. Further, it is also a reminder that they aren't simply 'the enemy' through and through.
Offline
Sycamore and Breadcultist were having a good time reading this publication on UK Liberal Democrat party's positions on Obscenity: http://www.melonfarmers.co.uk/pdfs/libdem04.pdf
NEW To-Do task if you're feeling motivated (I'm useless until Tuesday at least, too many scheduled work hours):
-----Task-----
Pages 8-14 of the linked document are applicable to our cause. Their points are stock full of useful quotes and sources we should note down and abuse thoroughly at our leisure.
Dump their best quotes into Arokan's "Quotes that may come in handy" sticky thread: http://forums.yestofreedom.org/viewtopic.php?id=53
- (That's a highly useful idea for a thread Aro! Stickied.)
Dump their sources into Sycamore's "Source list" sticky thread: http://forums.yestofreedom.org/viewtopic.php?id=14
- please write a sentence or 2 clarifying what that point of each source is, so we may actually KNOW what it is we're referencing when using these sources to back up our arguments.
Offline
Spreading the word might be a good idea for a new task as its weight is quite significant and its importance crucial.
First, find contacts and websites through which we could advertise our organisation. Second, write and send emails to these websites to convince them to write about us, and maybe help spread the word themselves.
Offline
Az, I've already turned down a couple offers for word-spreading because the actual main web page is rather empty. It needs life first.
Which brings me to one of the new To-Do tasks!
Admins should fill our website main page with stuff now (solace's Timeline; ideas for the Arguments section: snippets from the loli/ero documents, etc.)!
Members (anyone reading this) can register on the new yestofreedom Wiki (http://core.nctritech.com/ytfwiki/index.php/Main_Page) and invent categories, dump data from the forums, etc.
Yay! There's stuff everyone can do now!
Offline
SO!
2 new tasks...
Anyone want to write down ideas (in this thread) for what we should fill the "Arguments" section with for the Main Website?
How about suggest categories to help us organize a Wiki about Anti-Censorship info, with an emphasis on "fringe" (sexual/violent) drawn art, comics, literature, and video games?
Here are a few good resources to start data-mining for content:
http://itlaw.wikia.com/wiki/Obscenity - general obscenity law info from a law Wiki
http://wapedia.mobi/en/Obscenity - slightly more comprehensive than above
http://www.answers.com/topic/freedom-of-speech - umbrella listing of main internet resources on freedom of speech
The CBLDF has a huge pile of resources on Obscenity. Their own:
Timeline,
Court case files,
Bibliography complete with their own summary notes
( this last link brings you to drawn Obscenity cases of the 90's; dear God are there a lot of them O_O ).
- All found here: http://www.cbldf.org/research/index.shtml
Offline
Another new (potential?) task: Somebody ought to compile a list of many female artists/contributors who've worked on Eroge
To help substantiate claims that our side is not a bunch of "hate-mail sending misogynists"... I'm not sure how beneficial this task idea is.
Thumb up / Thump down?
From its current entry in the To-Do list:
"We've all heard that women frequently participate in making Hentai and Eroge (artists, designers, it's a field open to everyone equally), we've all met women who consume deviant Hentai and Eroge (our own membership has plenty; also, slash fiction was basically invented by fangirls), but our opposition continues to insist it's a field completely overrun with rape-happy misogynistic "criminally male" stereotypes.
Let's prove them wrong (again, lol).
It would be a good thing for us to have a nice list we can show to them if ever accused of being entirely made up of testosterone-infused, disheveled ex-cons.
Even if they continue to ignore it and re-paint their opposition as "hate-mail sending misogynists", it could still benefit our public face. "
Offline
We might get some material from these guys: http://www.hongfire.com/forum/showthread.php?t=111111
We could post the IRC, a link to the to-do list on the forum, ect... We might be able to recruit some people.
They have also created a petition, which we could link to from the main page. http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/eroge/
Anyone want to write down ideas (in this thread) for what we should fill the "Arguments" section with for the Main Website?
How about suggest categories to help us organize a Wiki about Anti-Censorship info, with an emphasis on "fringe" (sexual/violent) drawn art, comics, literature, and video games?
Arguement section: We could add links to the documents, they do have a lot of arguements in them. Otherwise, we could put it in a QA format. Q: Don't rape eroge promote rape? Q: Doesn't lolicon increase the chance of the person raping a child/Doesn't lolicon lead to child porn? Ect.
Wiki categories: Essays, Studies, Links to possible allies, To-do, Timeline...
Offline
I agree with LunarSD, I'm not asking us to become a mini-sankakucomplex, but it would be nice to have a steady flow (maybe someone can build a timeline of the regression of expressive rights) of the opposition's actions posted on the main page ( when it happens, than compiled into a separate page later) so we know who exactly does not agree with us, so we can make sure the floor (that is, anywhere our opposition is enforcing laws which breach basic rights of expression) has equal representation of our side as well.
We definitely want a date, name, and places compiled into a small database (maybe just a chart to start). Can't get very far without that. Until then our events, emails, and projects are just really general without any specific direction.
Last edited by Orenji (2010-01-28 02:36:04)
Offline
10/05/09
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2009/10/0 ? tally-ill/
Nanako Ooba claims lolicon art viewers are "mentally ill", are suffering from "denial", and "lolicon art promotes sexual abuse." She lists she needs "No evidence to support a ban on lolicon." (What's wrong with these people?)
That has got to be quite possibly one of the stupidest things I've ever heard.
I view lolicon art and I'm on my way to graduating with a Psychology major at a four-year university. I'm clearly not mentally ill and suffering from any form of denial.
For fuck's sake, the need for empirical data exists for a good reason, it's practically a basic law of statistical research, especially in Psych.
Shit, if nobody needed evidence to support the ban of something, tons of people would easily hit rap music with the banhammer, labelling it as a derogatory artform that degrades women, promotes violence, negatively influences our youth, and generally has a negative impact on society.
Are such statements true by default without evidence to support them? Fuck no. Common? Lupe Fiasco? Talib Kweli? Sage Francis? If they're not artists promoting a positive message in your eyes, then it is an official fact that you are blind.
7/07/09
Agnes-chan, ?People...don?t need freedom of expression.?
-That statement is just purely disconcerting on several levels that I can't even begin to explain.
Last edited by VerbalEssence (2010-01-28 22:38:59)
Offline
Unfortunately you can make laws for nearly anything. There need not be a logical reason. The only thing standing in the way are rules you would have to follow for the law to qualify as one.
Offline
I believe this is kinda important,since CR contacted Charles Brownstein, Executive Director of the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund, for comment.
http://www.comicsreporter.com/index.php … upervised/
Offline
Indeed, interesting. We plan on contacting the CBLDF at some point ourselves.
Anyway, I will make building a new Timeline with this info - as a complement to our old Timeline - one of our current priorities. Now we just have to hope that someone will pick it up.
Offline
Some of the posts in this topic reflect responses on the timeline of Sankaku Complex news I've posted.
I've now moved and recompiled those responses into the News board as a new project, and deleted my previous posts. Please continue discussion there.
Offline